The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Division of Corporation Finance has expanded its crypto-asset frequently asked questions with three answers focused on governance and network control. Added on November 2, the material addresses when participants in a broad-based governance system may be considered a central party, what it means to oversee participation in a crypto network, and how functionality differs from decentralization. The update gives developers, foundations and token issuers a more concrete set of factors for analyzing control under the SEC's March 2026 interpretive framework. It does not change the law or create a binding safe harbor.

Broad governance does not automatically create a central party

The staff said the analysis depends on facts and circumstances. Participants in a broad-based governance system generally will not be treated as a group constituting a central party when they are unaffiliated and have no formal or informal agreement to act in concert outside the governance system itself. That conclusion can also apply when governance operates through an organization, association or foundation and participation is based on holding the network's native crypto asset. Even if participants are considered a group, the group would still need operational, economic or voting control over the system to meet the framework's central-party definition. The staff describes qualifying broad governance as transparent, rules-based and sufficiently diverse that decision-making is not concentrated directly or through delegation.

Related reporting: Hester Peirce sets October 2 departure from SEC

Authority over participation is the practical test

A second answer focuses on who can decide how users, nodes, validators or organizations interact with a network. The staff said oversight can exist at the protocol, validator or user level. Examples include unilateral power to grant or restrict access, change the voting process for upgrades or token distributions, decide who may join consensus, modify rules-based code, reverse transactions or revoke access. By contrast, the staff generally would not view a central party as overseeing participation when every material operational function runs automatically under code without human discretion. It reached a similar conclusion where any material discretion is exercised only through broad-based governance whose participants do not themselves form a central party.

Functionality and decentralization answer different questions

The third addition separates two terms that are often used together. A system is functional when its native asset can be used according to the system's programmed utility. A system is decentralized when it operates autonomously without a person, entity or coordinated group holding operational, economic or voting control. A functional network can therefore have characteristics of decentralization without every network having the same degree of decentralization. The staff said the degree remains a facts-and-circumstances assessment. That distinction matters because a working product does not, by itself, establish that control has been dispersed.

What the update means for U.S. crypto projects

The new factors direct attention away from governance labels and toward actual authority. Projects describing themselves as community-run will still need to examine delegated voting power, foundation influence, upgrade permissions, validator admission and emergency controls. The guidance may help teams document how decisions are proposed, debated and implemented, but it does not resolve every classification question. The Division emphasized that the FAQs express staff views only: they are not an SEC rule, the Commission has neither approved nor disapproved them, and they carry no legal force. Independent reporting from Coin Edition similarly noted that the three answers clarify the staff's approach without imposing new obligations. Market participants must still assess their own structures under applicable securities law and the Commission's broader interpretive release.

Sources

AI-generated editorial image; not a photograph of the reported event. Prepared with AI assistance and source verification.