Service businesses in the New York Federal Reserve's region reported a sharper fall in activity and faster selling-price increases in October, an awkward combination for firms already facing elevated costs. The bank's Business Leaders Survey, released October 16, put its headline activity index at -20.7, down twelve points from September and the lowest since March. It also found that the pace of price increases charged to customers was the fastest since 2022. The results are a regional reading of business conditions, not a measure of national output or a decision on interest rates.

Activity weakens while costs remain high

The New York Fed surveys service-sector executives in New York State, northern New Jersey and southwestern Connecticut. Responses for this report were collected October 2–9. Twenty-two percent of respondents said business conditions improved over the month, while 42 percent said they worsened. The business climate index was little changed at -35.0, a reading the bank says indicates conditions remained much worse than normal. A negative diffusion index means more firms reported deterioration than improvement; it does not mean activity contracted by that percentage.

Related reporting: Fed's Hammack Urges Faster Move to Restrictive Policy

Price signals moved in the opposite direction from activity. The prices paid index stayed near 70.0, indicating that input costs were still increasing sharply. The prices received index rose three points to 36.3, its highest level in four years. That measure reflects the balance of firms reporting higher versus lower selling prices, not the inflation rate paid by consumers. Reuters independently reported the survey's combination of broad pricing pressure and weaker activity, while noting that other indicators have portrayed a stronger wider economy.

Hiring holds, investment plans soften

The survey's employment index rose five points to zero, suggesting that staffing was broadly steady after edging lower in September. Its wages index was little changed at 28.2, which the New York Fed characterized as modest wage growth. Capital spending weakened: that index slipped two points to -4.2. Supply availability continued to deteriorate, although the survey indicated the pace of worsening had eased somewhat. Together, those details show a more uneven picture than the headline activity number alone.

Executives also turned less confident about the months ahead. The index for expected business activity over the next six months fell ten points to -5.1, entering negative territory for the first time since December 2025. The future capital spending index turned negative as well. Firms still expected elevated increases in both input and selling prices. These are respondents' expectations, however, rather than a forecast that prices or business activity will necessarily follow that path.

What the release can and cannot tell policymakers

The survey adds a timely regional view to the U.S. inflation and growth debate. For businesses, the combination of softer demand and higher costs can make pricing and investment decisions harder. For markets, the price components may be relevant context ahead of future Federal Reserve meetings, but a single regional business survey cannot determine monetary policy. Reuters noted that the same area's manufacturing survey had shown a stronger activity reading a day earlier, reinforcing the need to compare different sectors rather than treat one report as the whole economy.

The New York Fed says its survey is generally sent to roughly 150 regional service executives and typically receives about 100 responses. That makes it useful as a high-frequency signal, but its geography and sample limit broad national conclusions. The next test will be whether the weaker activity and persistent price pressure appear in other regional surveys and official national data. Until then, the October report establishes what these firms experienced and expected at the time they answered, not what will happen to rates or inflation across the United States.

Sources

AI-generated editorial image; not a photograph of the reported event. Prepared with AI assistance and source verification.